Main

August 23, 2006

Apocalypticism as social control (III).

(Part one of this series dealt with the nature of apocalypticism and its ability to create an insular culture. Part two concerned the investiture of otherness into the primary culture.)

Adherents to the apocalyptic tradition have now, in pluralist societies, two powers not well known to secondary cultures: freedoms of religion and association. By removing the social structures so effective in oppressing the minority culture, the primary has disarmed one of the major reasons for continued loyalty to the apocalyptic secondary identity (and the infrastructure that surrounds it). If there are no codified methods of oppression, then the methods and metaphors of apocalypticism lose relevance as critical techniques.

Continue reading "Apocalypticism as social control (III)." »

July 31, 2006

Apocalypticism as social control (II).

(Part one of this series dealt with the nature of apocalypticism and its ability to create an insular secondary culture.)

A population can be insular without necessarily demonizing cultures peripheral (or, as insular derives from the Latin for island, external) to itself. Insularity is, in the case of the oppressed secondary culture experiencing apocalypticism, cautious self-identification only with those who share cultural competencies. It is a survival mechanism in a time where political subversion or the appearance of subversion brings drastic consequences.

Continue reading "Apocalypticism as social control (II)." »

July 25, 2006

Apocalypticism as social control (I).

There is a spot-on analysis of the political conservative movement over in Design Observer, in a guest column by Rick Perlstein. He suggests that at the heart of the conservative movement, its primary code and self-identification, is the narrative of persecution. The conservatives define themselves as being "hemmed in" on all sides, and this is the underlying cause for the unified front the conservatives present.

Perlstein has beaten me to the punch when it comes to a dissection of the primary narrative of conservatism, as I have been struggling to articulate what I have been observing on the national stage. The recent legislation against stem cells, the production of the "culture of death" terminology, the movement against equality for homosexuals all seem rooted in the solidarity of Christian conservatives and evangelicals. Perlstein does not neglect the intertwined trajectories of modern conservatives (perhaps they call themselves "neoconservatives" these days) and the fundamentalist Christian movement, but I do not believe he goes far enough in attributing the narrative of persecution to the nature of evangelicism.

The heart of the evangelical and conservative Christian cultures is apocalypticism. Despite disagreement and attempts at disambiguation, apocalypticism is primarily a critical technique employed by sociopolitical commentators that shrouds its analysis and subversion in the language of the eschaton (the "end times").

Continue reading "Apocalypticism as social control (I)." »

June 20, 2006

About my process.

If I can be said to have a writing process, it is something like this: Sit down in front of computer. Open word processor. Be visited by a woman wearing a long bedsheet and more than likely a funny hat. Read what I just wrote so when people ask me about it I will know what's going on.

But, to move away from too-vague jokes about Greek mythology, this is basically a description of how I've always written. There is a definite need for inspiration, otherwise I just roll in circles, but at the same time when I sit to the screen I can usually depend on some kind of inspiration. The spontaneity is not much of a factor when it comes to putting the words all down, because a large part of how I write is to be struck at four in the morning with a phrase, and later that evening start with the phrase and let it snowball into something else.

Among psychologists who've studied writing, they have agreed that there is a phenomenon called "flow" where the writer is, to put it in a trite sports metaphor, "in the zone." (The psychology speak is "lack of presence.") That is, the writer who finds the flow is no longer aware of himself, only of the story. This is how I write. It is not so much stringing words together to form sentences as it is letting the film reel unwind in my head. I watch these narratives happen, and when the narrative is over, there are words and sentences and paragraphs. When I go about re-reading them, I experience the same effect, if I have done a good job.

That's how I proofread. How quickly does the film come back, and does it look like it did the first time? My mom will tell you that description has always been my strong suit. Perhaps this is why: I'm not writing a story so much as condensing a vision into some other medium. This has been most evident in what I'd consider my "good" stories, the ones that started most strongly in my imagination, the ones that I thought I wrote the best.

One of these days (and count them one closer, as I have written more tonight) when I finish my manuscript, A Life of Fire, and after it's published, we'll see if it comes across as any less psychotic than it seems to me.

June 13, 2006

The wanderer.

In 2002, I traveled to Australia and New Zealand as part of a medical forum for college students potentially interested in healthcare careers. Having long ago decided that a doctor's life was not for me, I went along anyhow, considering it was a trip to Australia and New Zealand--and God knows when I'll ever get the chance to go back.

During our stay in northeast Queensland, we visited an aboriginal community healthcare center. Because of metabolic differences between the aboriginal population (which is by no means a singular entity--there are many different populations and tribes of aborigines in Australia), the incidence of diabetes was a particularly strong cause of rising morbidity among the locals. To peoples whose hereditary background included long times of famine, extraordinary physical exertion to support a hunter/gatherer lifestyle, and the relative lack of suitable plantlife for agriculture, the simple carbohydrates of European food are murderous.

The head of the community healthcare center spent a bit of time discussing the challenges specific to treating an aboriginal community from both the cultural viewpoint and the symptomatic side of the issue, and at the end of the lecture we had a short break to get a snack and stretch our cramped legs. Most of the seventy other students went outside into the Cairns sunshine, but I stayed in the cool of the classroom--the midmorning light in Oz has teeth, and it takes only fifteen or twenty minutes to feel bruises stemming from the gold light in the empty blue sky.

For the four or five of us left, the director began a story of a patient he'd treated, whose Anglicanized name was Michael. (The Australian colonial government in the 1910s and '20s began a movement toward isolating and "breeding out" aboriginal bloodlines by separating families and enforcing surgical sterilization, much akin to the United States' own activities against American Indians.) When he was a younger man, he'd lived in an aboriginal boarding house with other young people who'd been separated from their families by the Australian military.

Michael loved a local girl, an aborigine woman he'd met while tending officers' stables at the garrison adjacent to the boarding house. Her new, European name was Angela, and from all accounts Michael believed the young woman was his angel, sent from Heaven to allow him a measure of peace and happiness in his harsh life. Michael had planned to marry Angela, and had gathered traditional presents and artifacts made by members of a neighboring tribe as wedding gifts. With the presents in hand, he began the four-mile walk back to the boarding house and the outpost.

When he arrived in the little farmstead he planned to cultivate with Angela, he found an Australian military officer and two cohorts waiting in his living room. Angela was not to be found. Concerned, Michael asked the officers what had happened to his fiance; the officer told Michael that he had asked Angela to marry him, and she had accepted. Michael could not provide her a lifestyle in this environment, whereas the trappings of the officer's salary would make quite a comfortable homestead. That this served to further dilute the aboriginal genepool was a benefit to social policy, but finding himself with a beautiful girl as his wife was surely not objectionable to the officer.

Stunned, Michael left the homestead and walked to the stables. There he found a machete used to clear scrub. Entranced, scattered, his thoughts distant and broken, he walked back to the homestead that was no longer his, and buried the half-moon blade in the back of the officer's skull. Leaving the body bleeding behind him, Michael shed his Anglican name, his linen clothes, and with nothing covering him but shadow and anger he ran into the bush. He was 20.

In 1985, an old and sun-scarred man came out of the jungle to live in the city. He lived a normal life, visited restaurants, and haunted the outskirts of town. He had no children and no family, and the local government--in an act both of contrition and kindness--provided him a modest stipend to live in a one-bedroom apartment in a low income complex.

During the next twelve years, the man without a name changed. His body, muscular and thin, lost its tone. His lungs lost their air; the arches of his feet collapsed. He could no longer run for miles, could no longer run from the first whispers of morning until the sun collapsed in exhaustion and the stars sparkled above. As he became accustomed to the European diet, his health decayed.

In 1998, the director of the aboriginal clinic oversaw an operation on the old man: the amputation of his left foot just above the ankle. The ravages of diabetes destroyed his body, and the ulcers on his foot had become septic and gangrenous. One of diabetes' hallmark symptoms is neuropathy, the tingling and pain that comes from the slow death of the nerves in the extremities. He could not feel the cuts on his feet, and the swelling from edema had bloated them so that his shoes, once a stylish fit, had become tourniquets. Without circulation, flesh cannot heal; and without pain, he never knew anything was wrong.

Two months after he lost his foot, the old man died.

When he had emerged from the wilderness those years ago, the old villagers had recognized him, had known he was the man they talked about in local histories and folktales. The man who'd returned to the bush, the man who had spent fifty-one years in the wilderness, who had returned as fit and healthy as the day he had left. The old man had left his name behind, and in the lonely Outback had no need for another. The white Australians just knew him as the crazy drunk who'd come in from the jungle. The aborigines knew him by a different name, spoken sadly.

He was the man who had left to find the Dreamtime, before the changing ways, before the shaping of the world. He had sought out the Dreamtime and the formlessness and the magic of the old days.

The man who lost his way.

The man who died without dreaming.

June 08, 2006

Multiplicity of truths.

How intriguing it is to find yourself seen through the lens of someone else's perspective. There also comes a point, however, when the multiplicity becomes solipsism, and the loathing you glimpse in that foreign perspective is clouded by self-pity. History is written by the winners, it seems, but there are no winners when we find ourselves on the wrong end of a thousand sharp days and the lonelier gulf of a foggy memory.

The internet makes itself dangerous by its very nature. A web of thorns that connects and curls in on itself, so every empty branch is inextricably tied to every needling briar. Its illusion of confidence is the other dagger in the back; you write what you believe to be a confessional, in the booth, and you find on the other side of the screen not a priest, but a microphone. Anonymity in this space is hard to come by, and impossible to recapture when it's lost.

But there are no means to correct some mistakes, and there are no ways to take back the words that have polluted the air of the past. History is dust, and the dusty fingers of broken sentences and half-remembered slights will choke you to death with papyrus grasp.

In plainer language, I have found on the Internet a page written from someone I knew a ways ago. What had once been affection has curdled into hate, and since before the anger was attraction I was unaware regardless.

The nature of existence is to stumble blindly through the world and hope when the lights come on at the end of things you haven't knocked too much over.

May 21, 2006

The redness.

In February of this year, I began experiencing extreme pain in my jaw, as well as difficulties opening and closing it. It started slow, and I originally thought it was an ear infection. After flying home to Tennessee and back, I realized in the airport that I was randomly losing my hearing in my left ear--only to have it phase back in after ten or fifteen minutes. I was worried.

I went to a dentist, an otolaryngologist, a GP, and finally an oral surgeon, who diagnosed me with TMJ. The prescription? No solid food for a month and a half, no chewing at all, 400mg of ibuprofen every eight hours, and when I really needed it, some heavier pain medications.

All of that is tangentially related to what we're here to discuss tonight, though: Communism.

Continue reading "The redness." »

May 20, 2006

"Misspelled Epitaphs," part two.

During one week of April, I had to drive to and from South Austin to deliver items for our marketing company. One of the things I'm learning about this town is the large number of homeless individuals who have no other option besides begging on the side of the interstate. This particular day I had to make two trips to the company, spaced about an hour apart.

The first trip was uneventful. In the midst of the second, as I pull of I-35, I see a homeless man sitting canted on the guardrail ahead of me. He has a long beard, tattered clothes, shoes that at some point in the faroff past were white. He held a cardboard sign, and it read:

SO HUNGRY. COULD YOU SPARE A DIME?

The obliteration of the self struck me about his words. There is no "I" here, no "me," just the hunger--that is all that is left. I sat in traffic and felt my guts knot. I rolled down my window and held my hand out, and he sat a little closer on the guardrail. When the light turned green, I stopped by him and handed him five dollars. It was all the money I had in my wallet.

He pressed his dirty hands against mine and took my money. "God bless you, brother," he said, his face cracking into a toothless smile. "God bless you--"

I rolled a foot forward. If anyone behind me honked impatiently I was going to kill them.

"--and have a good day," he said, his eyes squinting. The sincerity in his voice, the fervor, the ebullience nearly destroyed me. I drove to the marketing company and thought to myself how horrible it is that one man could find five dollars so significant. I thought to myself how horrible it was I did not have more money to spare. I drove to the marketing company with my fists clenched and my eyes watering.

Five dollars and his face lit like a child's.

I should have given him more.

I've never seen him again.

May 18, 2006

"Misspelled Epitaphs," part one.

"Misspelled Epitaphs" is the name of a writing project I haven't attended to in quite a long time. It is mostly a series of essays and short observations about the tragedies and sadness of everyday life, as a reminder that our experience is fragile. One of the major themes I find in my artwork I refer to by my own neologism--"the everyday catastrophic"--and this is the first of the series. To be continued when I encounter something that fits.

After work I went to McDonald's. Two attorneys sat a few tables away, one on the phone, the other leafing through a three-ring binder. Three rows of empty chairs behind me, two men, old and grizzled and aching, sitting stiffly and moving more so, talked about friends and who was left and the war. The lawyer on the phone barks to her secretary. "I forgot, he's on vacation, send him an email. He'll get it anyway." She keeps talking to the man with the binder.

The two old men started talking. Their English mangled, grammar worse, clothes terrible. Spattered with paint and grime running in streaks down frayed pant legs. I don't look straight at him. I can hear him too well. "Where are you going on vacation?" the first one asks. "I don't know. Maybe take the kids somewhere," the second replies.

The female attorney laughs. "What are you going to do with this settlement?" she asks. The other attorney shrugs.

The old men are quiet.

"Been thinking about heading down to Bermuda or someplace warm," he says. "Get a boat, sail it down there. I don't really have the time for it all. Pool, maybe. That would be nice in summer."

The first old man looks to the second. "How's the boat?" he asks, his voice wavering just a little. "Boat's fine," the second says. "Gonna take the kids down on it to Florida. It'll be warm."

May 03, 2006

"Untitled #8"

Originally posted on Mountains of Kaf, Sunday, February 26, 2006.

I write this in the ringing silence between my ears, the memory of rising house lights still flush in my mind, satisfied and yet not sated. When you have experienced something so rousing, so beautiful that no matter how it ends, it will never have been enough, that is the space inside me at this moment.

I have just seen Sigur Ros.

Continue reading ""Untitled #8"" »

About ES

I'm the Brightside and this is my weblog about art, postmodernity, semiotics, photography, music, and the everyday catastrophic.

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2